↓ Skip to main content

Use of flavoured cigarettes in Poland: data from the global adult tobacco survey (2009–2010)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of flavoured cigarettes in Poland: data from the global adult tobacco survey (2009–2010)
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorota Kaleta, Bukola Usidame, Anna Szosland-Fałtyn, Teresa Makowiec-Dąbrowska

Abstract

Nowadays the European Union faces a debate on the ban of sale of flavoured cigarettes. There is growing evidence that certain subgroups of smokers are more vulnerable to the use of flavoured cigarettes. However in some European countries, figures on the use of these cigarettes are still scarce. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of flavoured cigarettes use in Poland, and examine whether its use among adults varies by socio-demographic characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Psychology 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,622,789
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,958
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,862
of 312,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#120
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.