↓ Skip to main content

Translation of TRO40303 from myocardial infarction models to demonstration of safety and tolerance in a randomized Phase I trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Translation of TRO40303 from myocardial infarction models to demonstration of safety and tolerance in a randomized Phase I trial
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-12-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Le Lamer, Stéphanie Paradis, Hidayat Rahmouni, Corinne Chaimbault, Magali Michaud, Marcel Culcasi, Jean Afxantidis, Mathilde Latreille, Patrick Berna, Alain Berdeaux, Sylvia Pietri, Didier Morin, Yves Donazzolo, Jean-Louis Abitbol, Rebacca M Pruss, Sophie Schaller

Abstract

Although reperfusion injury has been shown to be responsible for cardiomyocytes death after an acute myocardial infarction, there is currently no drug on the market that reduces this type of injury. TRO40303 is a new cardioprotective compound that was shown to inhibit the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and reduce infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion in a rat model of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 23 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,196,142
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,156
of 3,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,450
of 307,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#40
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.