You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A qualitative study of referral to community mental health teams in the UK: exploring the rhetoric and the reality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-7-117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolyn Chew-Graham, Mike Slade, Carolyn Montana, Mairi Stewart, Linda Gask |
| Abstract |
Generic community mental health teams (CMHTs) currently deliver specialist mental health care in England. Policy dictates that CMHTs focus on those patients with greatest need but it has proved difficult to establish consistent referral criteria. The aim of this study was to explore the referral process from the perspectives of both the referrers and the CMHTs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 55% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 32% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 23% |
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,603,714
of 24,630,122 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,095
of 8,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,718
of 70,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,630,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.