↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of disruptive selection in subdivided populations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of disruptive selection in subdivided populations
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2003
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-3-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Émile Ajar

Abstract

Analytical methods have been proposed to determine whether there are evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) for a trait of ecological significance, or whether there is disruptive selection in a population approaching a candidate ESS. These criteria do not take into account all consequences of small patch size in populations with limited dispersal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
France 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Malaysia 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 52 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 47%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,554
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,092
of 57,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.