You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of organisational-level interventions at work on employees’ health: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-135 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Diego Montano, Hanno Hoven, Johannes Siegrist |
Abstract |
Organisational-level workplace interventions are thought to produce more sustainable effects on the health of employees than interventions targeting individual behaviours. However, scientific evidence from intervention studies does not fully support this notion. It is therefore important to explore conditions of positive health effects by systematically reviewing available studies. We set out to evaluate the effectiveness of 39 health-related intervention studies targeting a variety of working conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
Finland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 33% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Gabon | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 344 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 78 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 12% |
Researcher | 40 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 6% |
Other | 69 | 20% |
Unknown | 66 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 116 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 38 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 24 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 7% |
Other | 43 | 12% |
Unknown | 78 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,821,655
of 24,162,141 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,024
of 15,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,629
of 317,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#36
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,162,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.