You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The science of epidemiology and the methods needed for public health assessments: a review of epidemiology textbooks
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-139 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hebe N Gouda, John W Powles |
Abstract |
Epidemiology is often described as 'the science of public health'. Here we aim to assess the extent that epidemiological methods, as covered in contemporary standard textbooks, provide tools that can assess the relative magnitude of public health problems and can be used to help rank and assess public health priorities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
Spain | 4 | 12% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Nepal | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
Scientists | 8 | 24% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 95 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Researcher | 6 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 20% |
Unknown | 27 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 30 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,887,970
of 24,954,788 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,119
of 16,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,114
of 324,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,954,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.