↓ Skip to main content

The science of epidemiology and the methods needed for public health assessments: a review of epidemiology textbooks

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The science of epidemiology and the methods needed for public health assessments: a review of epidemiology textbooks
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hebe N Gouda, John W Powles

Abstract

Epidemiology is often described as 'the science of public health'. Here we aim to assess the extent that epidemiological methods, as covered in contemporary standard textbooks, provide tools that can assess the relative magnitude of public health problems and can be used to help rank and assess public health priorities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 95 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,887,970
of 24,954,788 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,119
of 16,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,114
of 324,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,954,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.