You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrating rapid risk mapping and mobile phone call record data for strategic malaria elimination planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-52 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J Tatem, Zhuojie Huang, Clothilde Narib, Udayan Kumar, Deepika Kandula, Deepa K Pindolia, David L Smith, Justin M Cohen, Bonita Graupe, Petrina Uusiku, Christopher Lourenço |
| Abstract |
As successful malaria control programmes re-orientate towards elimination, the identification of transmission foci, targeting of attack measures to high-risk areas and management of importation risk become high priorities. When resources are limited and transmission is varying seasonally, approaches that can rapidly prioritize areas for surveillance and control can be valuable, and the most appropriate attack measure for a particular location is likely to differ depending on whether it exports or imports malaria infections. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 36% |
| United States | 4 | 18% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Thailand | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 7 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 27% |
| Unknown | 49 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2015.
All research outputs
#389,114
of 24,615,949 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#39
of 5,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,919
of 322,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.