You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High prevalence and diversity of species D adenoviruses (HAdV-D) in human populations of four Sub-Saharan countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-422x-11-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maude Pauly, Eileen Hoppe, Lawrence Mugisha, Klara Petrzelkova, Chantal Akoua-Koffi, Emmanuel Couacy-Hymann, Augustin Etile Anoh, Arsène Mossoun, Grit Schubert, Lidewij Wiersma, Sabwe Pascale, Jean-Jacques Muyembe, Stomy Karhemere, Sabrina Weiss, Siv Aina Leendertz, Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer, Fabian H Leendertz, Bernhard Ehlers |
| Abstract |
Human adenoviruses of species D (HAdV-D) can be associated with acute respiratory illness, epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, and gastroenteritis, but subclinical HAdV-D infections with prolonged shedding have also been observed, particularly in immunocompromised hosts. To expand knowledge on HAdV-D in Sub-Saharan Africa, we investigated the prevalence, epidemiology and pathogenic potential of HAdV-D in humans from rural areas of 4 Sub-Saharan countries, Côte d'Ivoire (CI), Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Central African Republic (CAR) and Uganda (UG). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,877,681
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#765
of 3,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,014
of 313,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#17
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.