↓ Skip to main content

Differentiating intraprofessional attitudes toward paradigms in health care delivery among chiropractic factions: results from a randomly sampled survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differentiating intraprofessional attitudes toward paradigms in health care delivery among chiropractic factions: results from a randomly sampled survey
Published in
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marion McGregor, Aaron A Puhl, Christine Reinhart, H Stephen Injeyan, David Soave

Abstract

As health care has increased in complexity and health care teams have been offered as a solution, so too is there an increased need for stronger interprofessional collaboration. However the intraprofessional factions that exist within every profession challenge interprofessional communication through contrary paradigms. As a contender in the conservative spinal health care market, factions within chiropractic that result in unorthodox practice behaviours may compromise interprofessional relations and that profession's progress toward institutionalization. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the professional stratification among Canadian chiropractic practitioners and evaluate the practice perceptions of those factions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 5%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 25%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 19 29%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 28%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 4 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,034,522
of 19,722,829 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#149
of 2,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,104
of 278,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,722,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them