You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Integrated Behavioural Model for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: a systematic review of behavioural models and a framework for designing and evaluating behaviour change interventions in infrastructure-restricted settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Dreibelbis, Peter J Winch, Elli Leontsini, Kristyna RS Hulland, Pavani K Ram, Leanne Unicomb, Stephen P Luby |
| Abstract |
Promotion and provision of low-cost technologies that enable improved water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) practices are seen as viable solutions for reducing high rates of morbidity and mortality due to enteric illnesses in low-income countries. A number of theoretical models, explanatory frameworks, and decision-making models have emerged which attempt to guide behaviour change interventions related to WASH. The design and evaluation of such interventions would benefit from a synthesis of this body of theory informing WASH behaviour change and maintenance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malawi | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 805 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 789 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 183 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 114 | 14% |
| Researcher | 109 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 4% |
| Other | 122 | 15% |
| Unknown | 171 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 102 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 98 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 9% |
| Engineering | 62 | 8% |
| Other | 165 | 20% |
| Unknown | 200 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,568,865
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,880
of 14,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,623
of 212,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#85
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.