Measuring underreporting and under-ascertainment in infectious disease datasets: a comparison of methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2014

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 6 news outlets
policy: 4 policy sources

twitter: 14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 274 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 310 Mendeley

Summary News Policy documents X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 29 X posts from 14 X users, with an upper bound of 70,471 followers.

RT @SixandLaura: Measuring underreporting and under-ascertainment in infectious disease datasets: a comparison of methods 2/11/2014 “an i…

31 Dec 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @SixandLaura: Measuring underreporting and under-ascertainment in infectious disease datasets: a comparison of methods 2/11/2014 “an i…

09 Oct 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

@lauraelee uncounted breakthrough infections are happening that are not included in local, state and CDC surveillance systems. https://t.co/x79oCOrUAI

07 Sep 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @SixandLaura: #EVALI investigation #syndromic #surveillance #CDC #IDPH https://t.co/EBYVT1oKJV

11 May 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 25 additional X posts.