You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Precision medicine in breast cancer: reality or utopia?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-017-1239-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ali Bettaieb, Catherine Paul, Stéphanie Plenchette, Jingxuan Shan, Lotfi Chouchane, François Ghiringhelli |
| Abstract |
Many cancers, including breast cancer, have demonstrated prognosis and support advantages thanks to the discovery of targeted therapies. The advent of these new approaches marked the rise of precision medicine, which leads to improve the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer. Precision medicine takes into account the molecular and biological specificities of the patient and their tumors that will influence the treatment determined by physicians. This new era of medicine is accessible through molecular genetics platforms, the development of high-speed sequencers and means of analysis of these data. Despite the spectacular results in the treatment of cancers including breast cancer, described in this review, not all patients however can benefit from this new strategy. This seems to be related to the many genetic mutations, which may be different from one patient to another or within the same patient. It comes to give new impetus to the research-both from a technological and biological point of view-to make the hope of precision medicine accessible to all. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 44 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#13,583,688
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,570
of 4,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,783
of 319,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#27
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.