↓ Skip to main content

Clinical implications for patients treated inappropriately for community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical implications for patients treated inappropriately for community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott T Micek, Adam Lang, Brian M Fuller, Nicholas B Hampton, Marin H Kollef

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most common infections presenting to the emergency department (ED). Increasingly, antibiotic resistant bacteria have been identified as causative pathogens in patients treated for CAP, especially in patients with healthcare exposure risk factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 23 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,363,356
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,581
of 7,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,407
of 307,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#123
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.