↓ Skip to main content

A consensus based template for reporting of pre-hospital major incident medical management

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A consensus based template for reporting of pre-hospital major incident medical management
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1757-7241-22-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabina Fattah, Marius Rehn, David Lockey, Julian Thompson, Hans Morten Lossius, Torben Wisborg

Abstract

Structured reporting of major incidents has been advocated to improve the care provided at future incidents. A systematic review identified ten existing templates for reporting major incident medical management, but these templates are not in widespread use. We aimed to address this challenge by designing an open access template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital major incident medical management that will be tested for feasibility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 52 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,422,252
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#119
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,632
of 307,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.