You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A consensus based template for reporting of pre-hospital major incident medical management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1757-7241-22-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sabina Fattah, Marius Rehn, David Lockey, Julian Thompson, Hans Morten Lossius, Torben Wisborg |
Abstract |
Structured reporting of major incidents has been advocated to improve the care provided at future incidents. A systematic review identified ten existing templates for reporting major incident medical management, but these templates are not in widespread use. We aimed to address this challenge by designing an open access template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital major incident medical management that will be tested for feasibility. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 6 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 30% |
Ireland | 2 | 10% |
Finland | 1 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 15% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 18% |
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,422,252
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#119
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,632
of 307,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.