↓ Skip to main content

Effect of gluten free diet on immune response to gliadin in patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of gluten free diet on immune response to gliadin in patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-14-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giacomo Caio, Umberto Volta, Francesco Tovoli, Roberto De Giorgio

Abstract

Non-celiac gluten sensitivity is a syndrome characterized by gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms occurring in a few hours/days after gluten and/or other wheat protein ingestion and rapidly improving after exclusion of potential dietary triggers. There are no established laboratory markers for non-celiac gluten sensitivity, although a high prevalence of first generation anti-gliadin antibodies of IgG class has been reported in this condition. This study was designed to characterize the effect of the gluten-free diet on anti-gliadin antibodies of IgG class in patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 232 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 58 24%
Student > Master 45 19%
Researcher 27 11%
Other 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 41 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 47 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,128,309
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#55
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,699
of 331,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.