↓ Skip to main content

Implementing a successful tuberculosis programme within primary care services in a conflict area using the stop TB strategy: Afghanistan case study

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing a successful tuberculosis programme within primary care services in a conflict area using the stop TB strategy: Afghanistan case study
Published in
Conflict and Health, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1752-1505-8-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khaled Seddiq, Donald A Enarson, Karam Shah, Zaeem Haq, Wasiq M Khan

Abstract

Afghanistan has faced health consequences of war including those due to displacement of populations, breakdown of health and social services, and increased risks of disease transmission for over three decades. Yet it was able to restructure its National Tuberculosis Control Programme (NTP), integrate tuberculosis treatment into primary health care and achieve most of its targets by the year 2011. What were the processes that enabled the programme to achieve its targets? More importantly, what were the underpinning factors that made this success possible? We addressed these important questions through a case study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 92 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 22%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Social Sciences 20 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Psychology 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,121,399
of 25,371,292 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#373
of 653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,459
of 320,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,292 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.