↓ Skip to main content

Anaplastic astrocytoma mimicking progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy: a case report and review of the overlapping syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anaplastic astrocytoma mimicking progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy: a case report and review of the overlapping syndromes
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12885-017-3415-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ema Kantorová, Michal Bittšanský, Štefan Sivák, Eva Baranovičová, Petra Hnilicová, Vladimír Nosáľ, Daniel Čierny, Kamil Zeleňák, Wolfgang Brück, Egon Kurča

Abstract

Co-occurrence of multiple sclerosis (MS) and glial tumours (GT) is uncommon although occasionally reported in medical literature. Interpreting the overlapping radiologic and clinical characteristics of glial tumours, MS lesions, and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) can be a significant diagnostic challenge. We report a case of anaplastic astrocytoma mimicking PML in a 27-year-old patient with a 15-year history of MS. She was treated with interferon, natalizumab and finally fingolimod due to active MS. Follow-up MRI, blood and cerebrospinal fluid examinations, and biopsy were conducted, but only the latter was able to reveal the cause of progressive worsening of patient's disease. Anaplastic astrocytoma misdiagnosed as PML has not yet been described. We suppose that the astrocytoma could have evolved from a low grade glioma to anaplastic astrocytoma over time, as the tumour developed adjacent to typical MS plaques. The role of the immunomodulatory treatment as well as other immunological factors in the malignant transformation can only be hypothesised. We discuss clinical, laboratory and diagnostic aspects of a malignant GT, MS lesions and PML. The diagnosis of malignant GT must be kept in mind when an atypical lesion develops in a patient with MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 19 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 21 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,557,505
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,807
of 8,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,417
of 318,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#60
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,483 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.