You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of haploidentical γδ T cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-12-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Wilhelm, Manfred Smetak, Kerstin Schaefer-Eckart, Brigitte Kimmel, Josef Birkmann, Hermann Einsele, Volker Kunzmann |
| Abstract |
The primary aim of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility and safety of an adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical γδ T lymphocytes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 21 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,614,477
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#458
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,256
of 345,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#7
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.