You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring adherence to antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: The feasibility of collecting routine data for key indicators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-43 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John C Chalker, Tenaw Andualem, Lillian N Gitau, Joseph Ntaganira, Celestino Obua, Hailu Tadeg, Paul Waako, Dennis Ross-Degnan, INRUD-IAA |
| Abstract |
An East African survey showed that among the few health facilities that measured adherence to antiretroviral therapy, practices and definitions varied widely. We evaluated the feasibility of collecting routine data to standardize adherence measurement using a draft set of indicators. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 23% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,634,936
of 23,705,225 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,049
of 7,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,397
of 96,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,705,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.