You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Measuring electromagnetic fields (EMF) around wind turbines in Canada: is there a human health concern?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Health, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-13-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lindsay C McCallum, Melissa L Whitfield Aslund, Loren D Knopper, Glenn M Ferguson, Christopher A Ollson |
Abstract |
The past five years has seen considerable expansion of wind power generation in Ontario, Canada. Most recently worries about exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) from wind turbines, and associated electrical transmission, has been raised at public meetings and legal proceedings. These fears have not been based on any actual measurements of EMF exposure surrounding existing projects but appear to follow from worries from internet sources and misunderstanding of the science. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 15 | 34% |
Australia | 6 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
Canada | 2 | 5% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 34 | 77% |
Scientists | 6 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 15% |
Engineering | 14 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 24% |
Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,139,536
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#251
of 1,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,479
of 346,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.