↓ Skip to main content

Concept for individualized patient allocation: ReCompare—remote comparison of particle and photon treatment plans

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concept for individualized patient allocation: ReCompare—remote comparison of particle and photon treatment plans
Published in
Radiation Oncology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-9-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Armin Lühr, Steffen Löck, Klaus Roth, Stephan Helmbrecht, Annika Jakobi, Jørgen B Petersen, Uwe Just, Mechthild Krause, Wolfgang Enghardt, Michael Baumann

Abstract

Identifying those patients who have a higher chance to be cured with fewer side effects by particle beam therapy than by state-of-the-art photon therapy is essential to guarantee a fair and sufficient access to specialized radiotherapy. The individualized identification requires initiatives by particle as well as non-particle radiotherapy centers to form networks, to establish procedures for the decision process, and to implement means for the remote exchange of relevant patient information. In this work, we want to contribute a practical concept that addresses these requirements.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Physics and Astronomy 5 11%
Psychology 4 9%
Computer Science 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 11 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#2,018,570
of 3,627,150 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#387
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,097
of 98,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#46
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,627,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.