You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
The effect of high‐top and low‐top shoes on ankle inversion kinematics and muscle activation in landing on a tilted surface
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1757-1146-7-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Weijie Fu, Ying Fang, Yu Liu, Jianfu Hou |
| Abstract |
There is still uncertainty concerning the beneficial effects of shoe collar height for ankle sprain prevention and very few data are available in the literature regarding the effect of high-top and low-top shoes on muscle responses during landing. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of high-top and low-top shoes on ankle inversion kinematics and pre-landing EMG activation of ankle evertor muscles during landing on a tilted surface. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 12% |
| Canada | 8 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Guam | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 89% |
| Scientists | 5 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 34 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Engineering | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |