↓ Skip to main content

Early response index: a statistic to discover potential early stage disease biomarkers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early response index: a statistic to discover potential early stage disease biomarkers
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1712-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sirajul Salekin, Mehrab Ghanat Bari, Itay Raphael, Thomas G. Forsthuber, Jianqiu (Michelle) Zhang

Abstract

Identifying disease correlated features early before large number of molecules are impacted by disease progression with significant abundance change is very advantageous to biologists for developing early disease diagnosis biomarkers. Disease correlated features have relatively low level of abundance change at early stages. Finding them using existing bioinformatic tools in high throughput data is a challenging task since the technology suffers from limited dynamic range and significant noise. Most existing biomarker discovery algorithms can only detect molecules with high abundance changes, frequently missing early disease diagnostic markers. We present a new statistic called early response index (ERI) to prioritize disease correlated molecules as potential early biomarkers. Instead of classification accuracy, ERI measures the average classification accuracy improvement attainable by a feature when it is united with other counterparts for classification. ERI is more sensitive to abundance changes than other ranking statistics. We have shown that ERI significantly outperforms SAM and Localfdr in detecting early responding molecules in a proteomics study of a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Importantly, ERI was able to detect many disease relevant proteins before those algorithms detect them at a later time point. ERI method is more sensitive for significant feature detection during early stage of disease development. It potentially has a higher specificity for biomarker discovery, and can be used to identify critical time frame for disease intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Engineering 4 9%
Computer Science 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,556,449
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,344
of 7,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,677
of 316,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#92
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.