↓ Skip to main content

To what extent do nurses use research in clinical practice? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To what extent do nurses use research in clinical practice? A systematic review
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet E Squires, Alison M Hutchinson, Anne-Marie Boström, Hannah M O'Rourke, Sandra J Cobban, Carole A Estabrooks

Abstract

In the past forty years, many gains have been made in our understanding of the concept of research utilization. While numerous studies exist on professional nurses' use of research in practice, no attempt has been made to systematically evaluate and synthesize this body of literature with respect to the extent to which nurses use research in their clinical practice. The objective of this study was to systematically identify and analyze the available evidence related to the extent to which nurses use research findings in practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Canada 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 151 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 20%
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 40 25%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 47 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 23%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Psychology 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,160,882
of 24,958,301 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#797
of 1,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,801
of 126,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,958,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.