↓ Skip to main content

BMI and recommended levels of physical activity in school children

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BMI and recommended levels of physical activity in school children
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4492-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillipp Schwarzfischer, Martina Weber, Dariusz Gruszfeld, Piotr Socha, Veronica Luque, Joaquin Escribano, Annick Xhonneux, Elvira Verduci, Benedetta Mariani, Berthold Koletzko, Veit Grote

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) and its health benefits are a continuous point of discussion. Recommendations for children's daily PA vary between guidelines. To better define the amount of PA necessary to prevent overweight and obesity in children, further research is needed. The present study investigates children's compliance to physical activity guidelines (PAGs) and the association between objectively measured PA and body mass index (BMI). Participating children were 11 years old (n = 419) and part of the European CHOP trial, which was conducted in Germany, Belgium, Poland, Spain, Italy. At least 2 days of PA measurements were collected from each child using a SenseWear™ armband. BMI was calculated from children's height and weight. Thresholds of min·day(-1) in PA needed to differentiate between normal and excess weight (overweight/obesity) were determined with Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) analysis. Additionally, adjusted linear and logistic regressions models were calculated for group differences and effects of a 5, 15 and 60 min·day(-1) increases in PA on BMI. Median time spent in total PA was 462 min·day(-1) (25th percentile; 75th percentile: 389; 534) and 75 min·day(-1) (41; 115) in moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA). Girls spent 36 min·day(-1) less in MVPA than boys and overweight/obese children 24 min·day(-1) less than normal weight children (linear regression, p < 0.001). 63.2% of the children met PAGs of 60 min·day(-1) in MVPA. The optimal threshold for min·day(-1) in MVPA determined with ROC analysis was 46 min·day(-1). Comparing 5, 15 and 60 min·day(-1) increases in PA revealed that an additional 15 min·day(-1) of vigorous PA had the same effect as 60 min·day(-1) of MVPA. Sedentary time and light PA showed contrary associations to one another, with light PA being negatively and sedentary time being positively associated with excessive weight. Current PAGs are met by 2/3 of children and seem appropriate to prevent excess weight in children. An official recommendation of daily 15-20 min of vigorous PA and further reduction of sedentary time could help to fight youth overweight and thus be of potential public health importance. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00338689 . Registered: June 19, 2006 (retrospectively registered).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 17%
Student > Master 27 15%
Researcher 15 8%
Unspecified 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 41 23%
Unknown 43 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 26 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 12%
Unspecified 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 51 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,069,530
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,135
of 14,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,771
of 315,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#185
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.