You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Biological health or lived health: which predicts self-reported general health better?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-189 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cristina Bostan, Cornelia Oberhauser, Gerold Stucki, Jerome Bickenbach, Alarcos Cieza |
Abstract |
Lived health is a person's level of functioning in his or her current environment and depends both on the person's environment and biological health. Our study addresses the question whether biological health or lived health is more predictive of self-reported general health (SRGH). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 10% |
Other | 10 | 25% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
Psychology | 3 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,495,306
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,592
of 17,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,132
of 240,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#182
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.