You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people’s lives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-50 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Froud, Sue Patterson, Sandra Eldridge, Clive Seale, Tamar Pincus, Dévan Rajendran, Christian Fossum, Martin Underwood |
| Abstract |
Low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem that many interpret within a biopsychosocial model. There is renewed concern that core-sets of outcome measures do not capture what is important. To inform debate about the coverage of back pain outcome measure core-sets, and to suggest areas worthy of exploration within healthcare consultations, we have synthesised the qualitative literature on the impact of low back pain on people's lives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 20% |
| Spain | 5 | 10% |
| France | 5 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Norway | 2 | 4% |
| Malta | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 76% |
| Scientists | 8 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 578 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 565 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 104 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 10% |
| Researcher | 51 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 6% |
| Other | 107 | 19% |
| Unknown | 142 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 171 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 93 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 34 | 6% |
| Psychology | 28 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 70 | 12% |
| Unknown | 168 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#632,065
of 24,229,740 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#76
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,135
of 229,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#5
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,229,740 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.