You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Iterative development of Stand Up Australia: a multi-component intervention to reduce workplace sitting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-11-21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maike Neuhaus, Genevieve N Healy, Brianna S Fjeldsoe, Sheleigh Lawler, Neville Owen, David W Dunstan, Anthony D LaMontagne, Elizabeth G Eakin |
| Abstract |
Sitting, particularly in prolonged, unbroken bouts, is widespread within the office workplace, yet few interventions have addressed this newly-identified health risk behaviour. This paper describes the iterative development process and resulting intervention procedures for the Stand Up Australia research program focusing on a multi-component workplace intervention to reduce sitting time. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| Australia | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 255 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 22% |
| Unknown | 54 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 25 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 8% |
| Psychology | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 67 | 26% |
| Unknown | 62 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,113,230
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,037
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,628
of 239,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#17
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.