↓ Skip to main content

Cerebral microcirculation is impaired during sepsis: an experimental study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebral microcirculation is impaired during sepsis: an experimental study
Published in
Critical Care, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc9205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Silvio Taccone, Fuhong Su, Charalampos Pierrakos, Xinrong He, Syril James, Olivier Dewitte, Jean-Louis Vincent, Daniel De Backer

Abstract

Pathophysiology of brain dysfunction due to sepsis remains poorly understood. Cerebral microcirculatory alterations may play a role; however, experimental data are scarce. This study sought to investigate whether the cerebral microcirculation is altered in a clinically relevant animal model of septic shock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 146 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Researcher 23 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Other 11 7%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 39 26%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 55%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,970
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,401
of 103,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.