You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
AdaBoost-based multiple SVM-RFE for classification of mammograms in DDSM
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-9-s1-s1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sejong Yoon, Saejoon Kim |
Abstract |
Digital mammography is one of the most promising options to diagnose breast cancer which is the most common cancer in women. However, its effectiveness is enfeebled due to the difficulty in distinguishing actual cancer lesions from benign abnormalities, which results in unnecessary biopsy referrals. To overcome this issue, computer aided diagnosis (CADx) using machine learning techniques have been studied worldwide. Since this is a classification problem and the number of features obtainable from a mammogram image is infinite, a feature selection method that is tailored for use in the CADx systems is needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 3 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 74 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 34% |
Researcher | 18 | 21% |
Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 50 | 59% |
Engineering | 10 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,567
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,205
of 94,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.