You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emotional and instrumental feeding practices of Dutch mothers regarding foods eaten between main meals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-171 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lieke GM Raaijmakers, Dorus WM Gevers, Dorit Teuscher, Stef PJ Kremers, Patricia van Assema |
| Abstract |
To assess how much of a public health problem emotional and instrumental feeding practices are, we explored the use of these feeding practices in a sample of Dutch mothers regarding their child's food intake between main meals. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 13% |
| Psychology | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,813
of 14,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,291
of 223,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#238
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.