↓ Skip to main content

Emotional and instrumental feeding practices of Dutch mothers regarding foods eaten between main meals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emotional and instrumental feeding practices of Dutch mothers regarding foods eaten between main meals
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lieke GM Raaijmakers, Dorus WM Gevers, Dorit Teuscher, Stef PJ Kremers, Patricia van Assema

Abstract

To assess how much of a public health problem emotional and instrumental feeding practices are, we explored the use of these feeding practices in a sample of Dutch mothers regarding their child's food intake between main meals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Other 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Psychology 9 8%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 36 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,813
of 14,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,291
of 223,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#238
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.