↓ Skip to main content

Emotional and instrumental feeding practices of Dutch mothers regarding foods eaten between main meals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emotional and instrumental feeding practices of Dutch mothers regarding foods eaten between main meals
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lieke GM Raaijmakers, Dorus WM Gevers, Dorit Teuscher, Stef PJ Kremers, Patricia van Assema

Abstract

To assess how much of a public health problem emotional and instrumental feeding practices are, we explored the use of these feeding practices in a sample of Dutch mothers regarding their child's food intake between main meals.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Psychology 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 23 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2014.
All research outputs
#4,606,984
of 6,229,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,199
of 6,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,288
of 134,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#235
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,229,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.