↓ Skip to main content

Uthando Lwethu (‘our love’): a protocol for a couples-based intervention to increase testing for HIV: a randomized controlled trial in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uthando Lwethu (‘our love’): a protocol for a couples-based intervention to increase testing for HIV: a randomized controlled trial in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Published in
Trials, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynae A Darbes, Heidi van Rooyen, Victoria Hosegood, Thulani Ngubane, Mallory O Johnson, Katherine Fritz, Nuala McGrath

Abstract

Couples-based HIV counseling and testing (CHCT) is a proven strategy to reduce the risk of HIV transmission between partners, but uptake of CHCT is low. We describe the study design of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to increase participation in CHCT and reduce sexual risk behavior for HIV among heterosexual couples in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. We hypothesize that the rate of participation in CHCT will be higher and sexual risk behavior will be lower in the intervention group as compared to the control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 23%
Social Sciences 26 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Psychology 13 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 38 24%