↓ Skip to main content

Clinical audit to enhance safe practice of skilled birth attendants for the fetus with nuchal cord: evidence from a refugee and migrant cohort

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical audit to enhance safe practice of skilled birth attendants for the fetus with nuchal cord: evidence from a refugee and migrant cohort
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan Parr, Colley Paw Dabu, Nan San Wai, Paw Si Say, Ma Ner, Nay Win Tun, Aye Min, Mary Ellen Gilder, François H Nosten, Rose McGready

Abstract

Current evidence for optimal management of fetal nuchal cord detected after the head has birthed supports techniques that avoid ligation of the umbilical cord circulation. Routine audit found frequent unsafe management of nuchal cord by skilled birth attendants (SBAs) in migrant and refugee birth centres on the Thai-Burmese border.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 28%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 26%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 16 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,306,334
of 12,019,430 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#395
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,104
of 189,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#25
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,019,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.