You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How research funding agencies support science integration into policy and practice: An international overview
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pernelle A Smits, Jean-Louis Denis |
| Abstract |
Funding agencies constitute one essential pillar for policy makers, researchers and health service delivery institutions. Such agencies are increasingly providing support for science implementation. In this paper, we investigate health research funding agencies and how they support the integration of science into policy, and of science into practice, and vice versa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 18% |
| Researcher | 40 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 51 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 7% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 19% |
| Unknown | 60 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2014.
All research outputs
#2,279,740
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#461
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,341
of 230,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.