↓ Skip to main content

Necrotizing fasciitis following saphenofemoral junction ligation with long saphenous vein stripping: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Necrotizing fasciitis following saphenofemoral junction ligation with long saphenous vein stripping: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1752-1947-4-161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stella Ruth Smith, Moayad Aljarabah, Graeme Ferguson, Zahir Babar

Abstract

Necrotizing fasciitis is a rare condition with a mortality rate of around 34%. It can be mono- or polymicrobial in origin. Monomicrobial infections are usually due to group A streptococcus and their incidence is on the rise. They normally occur in healthy individuals with a history of trauma, surgery or intravenous drug use. Post-operative necrotizing fasciitis is rare but accounts for 9 to 28% of all necrotizing fasciitis. The incidence of wound infection following saphenofemoral junction ligation and vein stripping is said to be less than 3%, although this complication is probably under-reported. We describe a case of group A streptococcus necrotizing fasciitis following saphenofemoral junction ligation and vein stripping.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Spain 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Other 6 29%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Psychology 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,294,762
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1,498
of 3,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,707
of 95,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,899 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.