↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of wheat straw using tannase and white-rot fungus to improve feed utilization by ruminants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of wheat straw using tannase and white-rot fungus to improve feed utilization by ruminants
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-1891-5-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shailendra Raghuwanshi, Swati Misra, Rajendra Kumar Saxena

Abstract

Current research to enrich cattle feed has primarily focused on treatment using white rot fungi, while there are scarce reports using the enzyme tannase, which is discussed only in reviews or in the form of a hypothesis. In this context, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of tannase on wheat straw (WS) and also the effect of lyophilized tannase at concentrations of 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3% (w/w) on WS followed by fermentation with Ganoderma sp. for 10 d and compared in relation to biochemical parameters, crude protein (CP) content, and nutritional value by calculating the C/N ratio in order to improve the nutritional value of cattle feed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Chemistry 4 7%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#656
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,007
of 238,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.