↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Clinical complications of G6PD deficiency in Latin American and Caribbean populations: systematic review and implications for malaria elimination programmes

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical complications of G6PD deficiency in Latin American and Caribbean populations: systematic review and implications for malaria elimination programmes
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-70
Pubmed ID
24568147
Authors

Wuelton M Monteiro, Gabriel P Franca, Gisely C Melo, Amanda LM Queiroz, Marcelo Brito, Henry M Peixoto, Maria Regina F Oliveira, Gustavo AS Romero, Quique Bassat, Marcus VG Lacerda

Abstract

Although G6PDd individuals are generally asymptomatic throughout their life, the clinical burden of this genetic condition includes a range of haematological conditions, including acute haemolytic anaemia (AHA), neonatal jaundice (NNJ) and chronic non-sphaerocytic anaemia (CNSA). In Latin America (LA), the huge knowledge gap regarding G6PDd is related to the scarce understanding of the burden of clinical manifestation underlying G6PDd carriage. The aim of this work was to study the clinical significance of G6PDd in LA and the Caribbean region through a systematic review.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Mali 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 27 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2021.
All research outputs
#13,057,165
of 20,294,453 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,904
of 5,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,314
of 199,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,294,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them

This page is provided by Altmetric.