↓ Skip to main content

Consanguineous marriages and endemic malaria: can inbreeding increase population fitness?

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consanguineous marriages and endemic malaria: can inbreeding increase population fitness?
Published in
Malaria Journal, August 2008
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-7-150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srdjan Denic, Nicolas Nagelkerke, Mukesh M Agarwal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 3%
India 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 27%
Student > Bachelor 7 23%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Social Sciences 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#14,673,111
of 24,607,331 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,533
of 5,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,198
of 90,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,607,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.