You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
GET.ON Mood Enhancer: efficacy of Internet-based guided self-help compared to psychoeducation for depression: an investigator-blinded randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Daniel Ebert, Dirk Lehr, Harald Baumeister, Leif Boß, Heleen Riper, Pim Cuijpers, Jo Annika Reins, Claudia Buntrock, Matthias Berking |
| Abstract |
Major depressive disorder (MDD) imposes a considerable disease burden on individuals and societies. A large number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the efficacy of Internet-based guided self-help interventions in reducing symptoms of depression. However, study quality varies considerably. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a new Internet-based guided self-help intervention (GET.ON Mood Enhancer) compared to online-based psychoeducation in an investigator-blinded RCT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Researcher | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 98 | 46% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2014.
All research outputs
#23,320,957
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#39
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,649
of 325,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#43
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.