↓ Skip to main content

Target volume delineation in breast conserving radiotherapy: are co-registered CT and MR images of added value?

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Target volume delineation in breast conserving radiotherapy: are co-registered CT and MR images of added value?
Published in
Radiation Oncology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-9-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirjam Mast, Emile Coerkamp, Mark Heijenbrok, Astrid Scholten, Wim Jansen, Erik Kouwenhoven, Jasper Nijkamp, Stephanie de Waard, Anna Petoukhova, Henk Struikmans

Abstract

In breast conserving radiotherapy differences of target volume delineations between observers do occur. We evaluated whether delineations based on co-registered computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may result in an improved consistency between observers. We used the delineation conformity index (CI) to compare clinical target volumes of glandular breast tissue (CTV breast) and lumpectomy cavity (LC) on both imaging modalities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Physics and Astronomy 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2014.
All research outputs
#13,708,378
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#723
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,110
of 221,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#29
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.