↓ Skip to main content

Genome and secretome analysis of the hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen, Moniliophthora roreri, which causes frosty pod rot disease of cacao: mechanisms of the biotrophic and necrotrophic phases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome and secretome analysis of the hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen, Moniliophthora roreri, which causes frosty pod rot disease of cacao: mechanisms of the biotrophic and necrotrophic phases
Published in
BMC Genomics, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lyndel W Meinhardt, Gustavo Gilson Lacerda Costa, Daniela PT Thomazella, Paulo José PL Teixeira, Marcelo Falsarella Carazzolle, Stephan C Schuster, John E Carlson, Mark J Guiltinan, Piotr Mieczkowski, Andrew Farmer, Thiruvarangan Ramaraj, Jayne Crozier, Robert E Davis, Jonathan Shao, Rachel L Melnick, Gonçalo AG Pereira, Bryan A Bailey

Abstract

The basidiomycete Moniliophthora roreri is the causal agent of Frosty pod rot (FPR) disease of cacao (Theobroma cacao), the source of chocolate, and FPR is one of the most destructive diseases of this important perennial crop in the Americas. This hemibiotroph infects only cacao pods and has an extended biotrophic phase lasting up to sixty days, culminating in plant necrosis and sporulation of the fungus without the formation of a basidiocarp.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 219 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 18%
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 42 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 18%
Chemistry 7 3%
Unspecified 3 1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 48 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,047,316
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,828
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,683
of 235,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#53
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.