You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a simple score to predict outcome for unresponsive wakefulness syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13745 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiao-gang Kang, Li Li, Dong Wei, Xiao-xia Xu, Rui Zhao, Yun-yun Jing, Ying-ying Su, Li-ze Xiong, Gang Zhao, Wen Jiang |
| Abstract |
Accurate assessment of prognosis for patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS; formerly vegetative state) may help clinicians and families guide the type and intensity of therapy; however, there is no suitable and accurate means to predict the outcome so far. We aimed to develop a simple bedside scoring system to predict the likelihood of awareness recovery in patients with UWS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,005
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,041
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,741
of 235,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#50
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.