You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Gaps in Indigenous disadvantage not closing: a census cohort study of social determinants of health in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand from 1981–2006
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-201 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francis Mitrou, Martin Cooke, David Lawrence, David Povah, Elena Mobilia, Eric Guimond, Stephen R Zubrick |
Abstract |
Australia, Canada, and New Zealand are all developed nations that are home to Indigenous populations which have historically faced poorer outcomes than their non-Indigenous counterparts on a range of health, social, and economic measures. The past several decades have seen major efforts made to close gaps in health and social determinants of health for Indigenous persons. We ask whether relative progress toward these goals has been achieved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 250 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 67 | 26% |
Student > Master | 45 | 18% |
Researcher | 21 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 6% |
Other | 42 | 16% |
Unknown | 47 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 41 | 16% |
Psychology | 14 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 9 | 4% |
Other | 46 | 18% |
Unknown | 50 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,345,268
of 25,113,446 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,487
of 16,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,149
of 227,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#26
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,113,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.