You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Post-intervention effects on screen behaviours and mediating effect of parental regulation: the HEalth In Adolescents study – a multi-component school-based randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-200 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingunn H Bergh, Maartje M van Stralen, Mona Bjelland, May Grydeland, Nanna Lien, Knut-Inge Klepp, Sigmund A Anderssen, Yngvar Ommundsen |
| Abstract |
To improve effectiveness of future screen behaviour interventions, one needs to know whether an intervention works via the proposed mediating mechanisms and whether the intervention is equally effective among subgroups. Parental regulation is identified as a consistent correlate of screen behaviours, but prospective evidence as well as the mediation role of parental regulation is largely lacking. This study investigated post-intervention main effects on screen behaviours in the HEIA-intervention--a Norwegian school-based multiple-behaviour study, as well as mediation effects of parental regulation by adolescents' and parents' report. In addition, moderating effects of gender and weight status on the intervention and mediating effects were explored. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 15% |
| Psychology | 19 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#13,708,378
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,877
of 14,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,031
of 220,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#181
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.