You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Processing of emotional words measured simultaneously with steady-state visually evoked potentials and near-infrared diffusing-wave spectroscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-11-85 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonie Koban, Markus Ninck, Jun Li, Thomas Gisler, Johanna Kissler |
| Abstract |
Emotional stimuli are preferentially processed compared to neutral ones. Measuring the magnetic resonance blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response or EEG event-related potentials, this has also been demonstrated for emotional versus neutral words. However, it is currently unclear whether emotion effects in word processing can also be detected with other measures such as EEG steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) or optical brain imaging techniques. In the present study, we simultaneously performed SSVEP measurements and near-infrared diffusing-wave spectroscopy (DWS), a new optical technique for the non-invasive measurement of brain function, to measure brain responses to neutral, pleasant, and unpleasant nouns flickering at a frequency of 7.5 Hz. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 26% |
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Professor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 37% |
| Engineering | 10 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,294,762
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#704
of 1,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,959
of 93,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.