You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A short-term treatment with tumor necrosis factor-alpha enhances stem cell phenotype of human dental pulp cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/scrt420 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mayu Ueda, Takuo Fujisawa, Mitsuaki Ono, Emilio Satoshi Hara, Hai Thanh Pham, Ryu Nakajima, Wataru Sonoyama, Takuo Kuboki |
| Abstract |
During normal pulp tissue healing, inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) or interleukins, act in the initial 48 h (inflammatory phase) and play important roles not only as chemo-attractants of inflammatory cells and stem/progenitor cells, but also in inducing a cascade of reactions toward tissue regeneration and/or reparative dentin formation. Previous reports have shown that inflammatory cytokines regulate the differentiation capacity of dental pulp stem/progenitor cells (DPCs), but none has interrogated the impact of these cytokines on the stem cell phenotype of stem/progenitor cells. This study investigated the effects of a short-term treatment with TNF-alpha on the stem cell phenotype and differentiation ability of human DPCs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2014.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1,721
of 2,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,763
of 221,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#26
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.