You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Where is the gap?: the contribution of disparities within developing countries to global inequalities in under-five mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-216 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Agbessi Amouzou, Naoko Kozuki, Davidson R Gwatkin |
| Abstract |
Global health equity strategists have previously focused much on differences across countries. At first glance, the global health gap appears to result primarily from disparities between the developing and developed regions. We examine how much of this disparity could be attributed to within-country disparities in developing nations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Senegal | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 36% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,908,227
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,248
of 17,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,758
of 236,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#39
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.