↓ Skip to main content

Agreement between self-reported and general practitioner-reported chronic conditions among multimorbid patients in primary care - results of the MultiCare Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Agreement between self-reported and general practitioner-reported chronic conditions among multimorbid patients in primary care - results of the MultiCare Cohort Study
Published in
BMC Primary Care, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-15-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heike Hansen, Ingmar Schäfer, Gerhard Schön, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Jochen Gensichen, Siegfried Weyerer, Juliana J Petersen, Hans-Helmut König, Horst Bickel, Angela Fuchs, Susanne Höfels, Birgitt Wiese, Karl Wegscheider, Hendrik van den Bussche, Martin Scherer

Abstract

Multimorbidity is a common phenomenon in primary care. Until now, no clinical guidelines for multimorbidity exist. For the development of these guidelines, it is necessary to know whether or not patients are aware of their diseases and to what extent they agree with their doctor. The objectives of this paper are to analyze the agreement of self-reported and general practitioner-reported chronic conditions among multimorbid patients in primary care, and to discover which patient characteristics are associated with positive agreement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 14%
Psychology 8 6%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Mathematics 6 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 29 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,119,031
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#926
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,845
of 236,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#20
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.