↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive screening of target molecules by next-generation sequencing in patients with malignant solid tumors: guiding entry into phase I clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive screening of target molecules by next-generation sequencing in patients with malignant solid tumors: guiding entry into phase I clinical trials
Published in
Molecular Cancer, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12943-016-0553-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuko Tanabe, Hitoshi Ichikawa, Takashi Kohno, Hiroshi Yoshida, Takashi Kubo, Mamoru Kato, Satoru Iwasa, Atsushi Ochiai, Noboru Yamamoto, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Kenji Tamura

Abstract

It is still controversial whether comprehensive genome screening of target molecules by next generation sequencing (NGS) is needed to increase clinical efficacy of investigational drugs or accelerate drug development, although several studies are being carried out. Therefore, we performed a prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of comprehensive gene screening in this setting. Our findings indicate that actionable alterations were identified in 45% of the analyzed patients, most frequently in those with breast cancer. Common actionable alterations were found in PIK3CA mutation, BRCA2 mutation, ERBB2 amplification, and CCND1 amplification. In total, 22% of the analyzed patients could be entered into phase I clinical trials, and 8% of them were treated with "matched" drugs. Among patients who received matched therapies, response and disease control rates were 33 and 78%, respectively. On the other hand, in the patients who received "non-matched" therapy, the objective response rate was 6%. We believe this data indicates that NGS-based molecular pre-screening is a potent platform for use before patient entry into phase I trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,558,284
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer
#1,297
of 1,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,476
of 270,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.