↓ Skip to main content

Noninvasive mechanical ventilation may be useful in treating patients who fail weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation: a randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Noninvasive mechanical ventilation may be useful in treating patients who fail weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation: a randomized clinical trial
Published in
Critical Care, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/cc6870
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristiane E Trevisan, Silvia R Vieira

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 159 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 17%
Other 26 15%
Student > Postgraduate 26 15%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 44 26%
Unknown 14 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 69%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 16 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,609,310
of 17,365,229 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,293
of 5,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,786
of 273,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#42
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,365,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.